- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:07:26 -0500
- To: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu>
- Cc: "public-reconciliation@w3.org" <public-reconciliation@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 3 June 2022 13:07:49 UTC
I think we can be bold with any future changes since we will be versioning. I don’t envision large programming efforts by users or institutions to adapt to new versions after .2 On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 6:45 AM Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu> wrote: > Hello all, > > We have made quite some changes since version 0.1 of the protocol, but > have not published them yet as a 0.2 version (for instance) that people > can refer to. I would be in favor of doing that soon. Are there any > changes you think should be made before that? > > Additionally, and once that is done, I wonder what people would think of > making bold changes to the API, as listed here: > > https://github.com/reconciliation-api/specs/issues/84 > > This would likely result in a fairly incompatible spec. I feel like now > is probably the time to do this: we have versioning in place, we can see > that there is interest from multiple parties in having this fixed, and > we have not transitioned to a Working Group yet (so we still have time > for large changes). > > I would be happy to hear how people think about this, because I think it > would be quite some work, that I would be happy to do but I prefer to > anticipate any blockers before starting to do it. > > Best, > > Antonin > > > -- Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ https://calendly.com/thadguidry/
Received on Friday, 3 June 2022 13:07:49 UTC