- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:11:24 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 01/09/2013 10:03 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 01/08/2013 04:00 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Ok. Now that HTML5 is in CR, I presume these things will not change >> either. If so, I agree that @value is not really an RDF related >> attribute and we should simply ignore it. > > +1 to remove @value processing. Also note that this would undo the following resolution: RESOLVED: Accept a <data> element with the @value attribute generating a plain literal with language retained; the HTML5+RDFa document will follow possible evolution of that element definition for datatypes made on this date: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-11-17 We can re-open this issue because the W3C HTML5 spec no longer includes the <data> element. The WHATWG version continues to define the element: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-data-element PROPOSAL: Remove @value attribute processing from HTML+RDFa 1.1 because the intent was to do @value processing on the DATA element, which no longer exists in the REC-track HTML5 specification. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 03:11:52 UTC