- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:14:16 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi folks, Gregg and I discussed the Reference Folding feature a bit today and then I went through and "refined" the text a bit. Readers will have to let us know if it is an improvement or not. http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-in-html/Overview-src.html High-level changes: 1. Renamed the feature from "Reference Folding" to "Property Copying". 2. Got rid of "rdfa:Prototype" as you may want to copy properties from something that isn't an rdfa:Prototype. 3. Changed "rdfa:ref" to "rdfa:include". 4. Removed the pass that removes the "prototype" features, as that may not be what the author always wants to do. For example, if you have a base model for something like a car, you don't want to delete it from the data as the knowledge of what the base model is can be useful. 5. Based on feedback from Bruce Lawson of Opera, I changed the first example to be a little more accessible. 6. I removed the use of bnodes in the examples because bnodes scare people. Thoughts? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 02:14:41 UTC