Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146)

> 
> 
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I suspect my implementation should either not issue a warning for link+rel, or should check whether it is an RDFa usage pattern, ie, whether the value of href is a CURIE or a URI. Probably the latter. Wait... using link with a URI is also a legitimate usage pattern! Ie, only CURIE-s are to be flagged I guess...
>> 
> 
> Where a CURIE is either a safe-curie or a thing that matches the production for a CURIE *and* the scheme used is pre-declared?  Or declared in the initial context? 

I guess all of the above...:-( 

Ivan



> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.

Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 18:41:05 UTC