Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146)

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>
>
> I suspect my implementation should either not issue a warning for
> link+rel, or should check whether it is an RDFa usage pattern, ie, whether
> the value of href is a CURIE or a URI. Probably the latter. Wait... using
> link with a URI is also a legitimate usage pattern! Ie, only CURIE-s are to
> be flagged I guess...
>
>
Where a CURIE is either a safe-curie or a thing that matches the production
for a CURIE *and* the scheme used is pre-declared?  Or declared in the
initial context?

-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.