W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: HTML+RDFa Editorial Comment

From: Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 21:52:42 +0530
Message-ID: <510D3D52.5080201@duckflight.de>
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On 02.02.2013 20:05, Manu Sporny wrote:
> I believe that the capitalization of 'this' is correct. In titles, 
> adjectives are capitalized. This is acting as an adjective in this 
> sentence, thus it is capitalized. 
> http://www.writersblock.ca/tips/monthtip/tipmar98.htm
In the end, the author has the last word, since that is you in this 
document use your freedom for your preferred style. There is actually 
not really a correct or incorrect, there are only different styles (in 
my humble opinion).

In 2.1 there is still one 'Internet media type' and one 'Internet Media 
Type', I would actually vote for 'internet media type', all three words 
small. Two occurances to check.

In 3.1 there is still written DTD, where it should be DOCTYPE declaration.
Comment from Shane McCarron from 31.01.2013:
The document does not 'contain a DTD'.  It contains a DOCTYPE 
declaration that references an XHTML+RDFa family DTD.  Or something 
along those lines.

The new three-sentence-version of the second last list item in 3.1 that 
you wrote is very much understandable now. Well written.
> 4. Extensions ..., list item 3
> 'must be considered flow and phrasing content, if used outside of the head of the document'.
> Fixed. I tried to clarify. See what you think.
Now I understand HTML+RDFa 1.1  completely. ;-) The link to 'flow 
content' is a good idea.

Happy LCing
Stefan

PS: If my message is messy html, I am sorry, still working under 
emergency system and couldn't figure out so quickly how to send plain text.
Received on Saturday, 2 February 2013 16:23:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC