- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:15:19 -0500
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 01/31/2013 07:10 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: > Following on to an earlier mail today, I somehow missed this: > > Documents served as |application/xhtml+xml|, that don't contain a > DTD, and don't specify a |@version| attribute /must/ be interpreted > as XHTML5+RDFa 1.1 documents. > > The document does not 'contain a DTD'. It contains a DOCTYPE > declaration that references an XHTML+RDFa family DTD. Or something > along those lines. Fixed. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Saturday, 2 February 2013 15:15:50 UTC