W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 10:35:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CADjV5je=vGMv-xTvw_iGb7R1fvqy=rRSRQdO86Xd0m51qydwRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi,

I found a problem in the latest draft. In  "3.1 Additional RDFa
Processing Rules", it says to use "HTMLLiteral" from the RDF
vocabulary. But according to "RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax:
5.2 The rdf:HTML Datatype" [1], that should be just "HTML". So replace
the two occurrences of "HTMLLiteral" with "HTML".

Also, I think it's great that @value is supported. IIUC, it means that
@value from <input> elements also can be captured with RDFa, correct?
But I wonder why @value is defined to override @content, and not vice
versa? I don't recall the reasons for that. (I was expecting @content
to work just like @resource overrides @href. I.e. to always override
any host language specific attribute; in this case, @value.)

Best regards,
Niklas

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html

On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> A new editor's draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 has been published which
> incorporates all decisions made by the newly re-chartered RDFa WG to
> date. As of this moment, there are no plans to add any new features or
> remove existing features from HTML+RDFa 1.1. This document is probably
> the one that is going to go to Last Call, so please review it and try to
> find any issues or problems:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-in-html-20121202/
>
> You can view a diff of the changes here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-in-html-20121202/diff-20120911.html
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power
> http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
>
Received on Sunday, 9 December 2012 09:36:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:32 UTC