- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 07:06:08 -0500
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 9 Dec 2012, at 04:35, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I found a problem in the latest draft. In "3.1 Additional RDFa > Processing Rules", it says to use "HTMLLiteral" from the RDF > vocabulary. But according to "RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax: > 5.2 The rdf:HTML Datatype" [1], that should be just "HTML". So replace > the two occurrences of "HTMLLiteral" with "HTML". Good catch! > > Also, I think it's great that @value is supported. IIUC, it means that > @value from <input> elements also can be captured with RDFa, correct? > But I wonder why @value is defined to override @content, and not vice > versa? I don't recall the reasons for that. (I was expecting @content > to work just like @resource overrides @href. I.e. to always override > any host language specific attribute; in this case, @value.) To be honest, I do not remember. I am on my mobile now, cannot check; the same question arises for time, doesn't it? Ivan > > Best regards, > Niklas > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> A new editor's draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 has been published which >> incorporates all decisions made by the newly re-chartered RDFa WG to >> date. As of this moment, there are no plans to add any new features or >> remove existing features from HTML+RDFa 1.1. This document is probably >> the one that is going to go to Last Call, so please review it and try to >> find any issues or problems: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-in-html-20121202/ >> >> You can view a diff of the changes here: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-in-html-20121202/diff-20120911.html >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power >> http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/ >
Received on Sunday, 9 December 2012 12:06:50 UTC