Re: ISSUE-87 (LC2 - Mischa Tuffield): IRIs vs URI References [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]

I sent a formal response to Issue 72 weeks ago - on 9 March.

On 3/23/2011 9:11 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 09:49 PM, Nathan wrote:
>> can we add this to the agenda for tomorrow?
> Sure, let's cover it first thing. We'll need to review it to make sure
> we can enter a 2nd LC... as well as ISSUE-72 (we don't have a formal
> response for that yet, but probably don't need one since it was created
> by the group).
>
>> RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> ISSUE-87 (LC2 - Mischa Tuffield): IRIs vs URI References [2nd LC
>>> Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/87
>>>
>>> Raised by: Manu Sporny
>>> On product: 2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1
>>>
>>> Mischa Tuffield has asked us to make sure that the terminology used in
>>> the RDFa Core 1.1 specification matches that used in the other
>>> Semantic Web documents (like SPARQL, RDF and the soon-to-be TURTLE
>>> specification):
>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0066.html
> -- manu
>

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com

Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 02:37:50 UTC