Re: Better Draft of "What's New in RDF 1.1" Note

Thanks, Pat.  Changes made (hopefully where you intended them).

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Dec 11, 2013, at 24:11, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote:

> Suggested rewording (in view of recent debates, to give a little more clarity):
> 
> Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatypes, replacing the old datatype maps, but this does not have any effect on implementation.
> //
> Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatype IRIs. The old semantics used the concept of a datatype map: in the new semantic description, this is the mapping from recognized IRIs to the datatypes they identify. This change does not have any effect on implementation or semantic entailments. 
> 
> Pat
> 
> 
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> A better draft of the “What’s New in RDF 1.1” Note is now available at [1].
>> 
>> Thanks to Peter for giving me feedback on my first attempt (which sucked).  Hopefully this one threads the needle between being useful and not duplicating the Primer.
>> 
>> Can someone please volunteer to review?  Thanks.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> --
>> http://about.me/david_wood
>> 
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-new/index.html
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.            (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile (preferred)
> phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>