Re: status RDF 1.1 Primer

On 12/11/13 10:50 AM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> FWIW, I support the idea that there must be an example of dataset in 
> Primer.
>
> The absence of a formal semantics is not an excuse to not have an 
> example. Shoudn't there be examples of datasets in the TriG spec? in 
> JSON-LD? in SPARQL (well, it's too late for SPARQL, examples are there 
> already)?

The critical thing here is to have an example that doesn't inadvertently 
create the illusion that it exemplifies semantics expressed in RDF model 
theory.


Kingsley
>
>
> AZ.
>
> Le 11/12/2013 16:02, Guus Schreiber a écrit :
>> Yves and I would like to propose to publish a first version of the
>> Primer. This is just to have a first version, so we do not need to have
>> everything fixed.
>>
>> The two main issues are:
>>
>> * multi-graph example
>> We appear to have consensus on a proposal by Sandro [1]. Assuming we can
>> agree on exact wording I suggest we can live with this for the moment.
>>
>> * JSON-LD example
>> Markus has suggested to move the JSON-LD example to Sec. 5. I'm
>> concerned that this will make the main body of the text too long.
>> However, I suggested we have more explanation in the JSON-LD Appendix,
>> so that it can act as a mini-primer for JSON-LD. Thoughts?
>>
>> Guus
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Dec/0062.html
>>
>>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen