W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: multiple-graph example in the Primner

From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:24:51 +0000
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
CC: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1386782690.5698.80.camel@RD000190>
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:37 +0100, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 4:59 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> > You can interpret dataset in whatever way you like. But your neighbour
> > can too, so there is little chance your interpretations will be
> > compatible in any way, unless you have out-of-band agreement to use
> > compatible interpretation.
>
> That's clear. What I wanted to know is why it *would* work if the "dataset" is marked as WebSource (of course if you share knowledge about WebSource) but not if the graph name is marked as such (according to Sandro).
>

Indeed - very curious about that as well, as that might have quite a big
impact on our proposal for the multigraph example. Pat, would it work to
have a "<http://example.org/bob> a eg:WebSource" triple, meaning what
Sandro said in his email?

Best,
Yves

>
> > If you want, the graph name denotes a graph, and this: <> denotes a
> > WebSource, but if you want, a graph name denotes the universe and <>
> > denotes a fish. The second would be considered, probably, bad practice,
> > but RDF 1.1 does not make recommendations in terms of best practices.
> >
> >
> > AZ
> >
> > Le 11/12/2013 16:42, Markus Lanthaler a écrit :
> > > On Saturday, December 07, 2013 5:02 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> I'd propose it's the dataset (<>) that's the WebSource, not /bob
> > that's
> > >> the WebSource.   Pat can correct me, but my sense is that nothing we
> > say
> > >> about the thing denoted by the graph name can affect what we're
> > saying
> > >> about the associated graph or how they are connected.   To say
> > >> something
> > >> about how the graph name's denotation and the associated graph are
> > >> related, we have to say something about the dataset itself.
> > >
> > > Pat, is that true? If so, why?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Markus Lanthaler
> > > @markuslanthaler
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Antoine Zimmermann
> > ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
> > École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
> > 158 cours Fauriel
> > 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
> > France
> > Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
> > Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
> > http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/

>
>



-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 17:25:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:36 UTC