- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:11:38 -0600
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Suggested rewording (in view of recent debates, to give a little more clarity): Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatypes, replacing the old datatype maps, but this does not have any effect on implementation. // Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatype IRIs. The old semantics used the concept of a datatype map: in the new semantic description, this is the mapping from recognized IRIs to the datatypes they identify. This change does not have any effect on implementation or semantic entailments. Pat On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > A better draft of the “What’s New in RDF 1.1” Note is now available at [1]. > > Thanks to Peter for giving me feedback on my first attempt (which sucked). Hopefully this one threads the needle between being useful and not duplicating the Primer. > > Can someone please volunteer to review? Thanks. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-new/index.html > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 05:12:04 UTC