Re: RDF WG charter and JSON-LD resolutions

Because it's on the agenda?

[[
Relationship JSON-LD <=> RDF
     Is JSON-LD a serialization syntax for all RDF graphs?
     Is JSON-LD only a serialization syntax for RDF graphs?
]]


	Andy

On 24/10/12 14:56, David Wood wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2012, at 09:55, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>>> That is a very good question.
>>
>> … with a simple answer: because Manu raised it (see top of this thread).
>
> Agreed.  That doesn't make it a good idea :)
>
> I suggest we end this.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> 	   Michael
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel.: +353 91 495730
>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>
>> On 24 Oct 2012, at 14:46, David Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 24, 2012, at 09:44, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Haven't we discussed all of this ad nauseam months and months and months ago?
>>>
>>> Yes :)
>>>
>>>> Why in the world are we going through this again?
>>>
>>> That is a very good question.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lee
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2012 9:42 AM, William Waites wrote:
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24/10/12 11:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are two use cases:
>>>>>>> 1/ Exchange of RDF in JSON
>>>>> I suppose I'm not clear on the motivation or importance of this
>>>>> use case. We already have plenty of ways to exchange RDF, why
>>>>> do we need another? It seems to me that having two kinds of
>>>>> JSON for doing RDF would just create unnecessary confusion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> - -w
>>>>>
>>>>> - -- William Waites MBCS
>>>>> Network Engineer                          Research Fellow
>>>>> High-speed Universal Broadband Scotland   School of Informatics
>>>>> University of Stirling                    University of Edinburgh
>>>>> http://www.tegola.org.uk/                 wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>>>>
>>>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQh/AsAAoJEAmkx526g9IZs2oP/2ySgkwLQq+AuJHFES0bbecL
>>>>> R6LbP7hwhAoH2y5H8iEit29hrlRSgmKOj5jFhYKR5rYrJohRXy0X3v51co6V/lGk
>>>>> iquSJUpyye4ZQn3P3kXh6pkJm0zHWYEHOK3mDQ5D2GG7PCxSkNOGZMEeGFEXlnGD
>>>>> yqArrNZiJ71pQux0bF5HckPaNepx+5aEOV4dr00bb5vh2X8G1i2l8kWl+HUEBqzt
>>>>> l1aHpKZ29s9nHLf5FDxncvn+lPN08TbYW55PUCqxwZPGARTnMRFji/5BF9x2B8Hy
>>>>> LT2YdmPDOj9WaBzuNScO6vQhdHP0aHEeDj519ZIZyVV96avb64OTi3NP+ka+pPkq
>>>>> Ath81RE8CTAZ81SE4RSF+M24AbSxchvZzVaZ5d8jm9ieB9owyKY0crMuuGWzXmx8
>>>>> 1agf40TfDYgqOJnwtNvtPzgIAfcZekneIt5n04/SO8xHTNZa7V/RO+bzg7mJ3pC/
>>>>> FaMYVI01wMzSqoil1QycgH4lkcBIMgc97Xff0D/f2TWDMoaJxgyvelGySGfQQreu
>>>>> pR+3ssSNjI0Ylxzq3Nda0HZR6JxlGJ2yJeRl0KReAfIXTpsNjVqLOSMLKlnOHClY
>>>>> AuS0dJQDd2TLZ4i4rgyzcWUbYTsXP7HQf5daeNDfyqM2OJGgHLaFY1AAmxbIUeJ0
>>>>> /p7s/iUpn5HsJepdYVDb
>>>>> =iMey
>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 14:08:52 UTC