- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:56:08 -0400
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <EDC531BB-0B23-464D-B59F-7CF84BCE7C95@3roundstones.com>
On Oct 24, 2012, at 09:55, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote: >> That is a very good question. > > … with a simple answer: because Manu raised it (see top of this thread). Agreed. That doesn't make it a good idea :) I suggest we end this. Regards, Dave > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel.: +353 91 495730 > http://mhausenblas.info/ > > On 24 Oct 2012, at 14:46, David Wood wrote: > >> On Oct 24, 2012, at 09:44, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: >> >>> Haven't we discussed all of this ad nauseam months and months and months ago? >> >> Yes :) >> >>> Why in the world are we going through this again? >> >> That is a very good question. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >>> >>> Lee >>> >>> On 10/24/2012 9:42 AM, William Waites wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> On 24/10/12 11:53, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> >>>>>> There are two use cases: >>>>>> 1/ Exchange of RDF in JSON >>>> I suppose I'm not clear on the motivation or importance of this >>>> use case. We already have plenty of ways to exchange RDF, why >>>> do we need another? It seems to me that having two kinds of >>>> JSON for doing RDF would just create unnecessary confusion. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> - -w >>>> >>>> - -- William Waites MBCS >>>> Network Engineer Research Fellow >>>> High-speed Universal Broadband Scotland School of Informatics >>>> University of Stirling University of Edinburgh >>>> http://www.tegola.org.uk/ wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk >>>> >>>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ >>>> >>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQh/AsAAoJEAmkx526g9IZs2oP/2ySgkwLQq+AuJHFES0bbecL >>>> R6LbP7hwhAoH2y5H8iEit29hrlRSgmKOj5jFhYKR5rYrJohRXy0X3v51co6V/lGk >>>> iquSJUpyye4ZQn3P3kXh6pkJm0zHWYEHOK3mDQ5D2GG7PCxSkNOGZMEeGFEXlnGD >>>> yqArrNZiJ71pQux0bF5HckPaNepx+5aEOV4dr00bb5vh2X8G1i2l8kWl+HUEBqzt >>>> l1aHpKZ29s9nHLf5FDxncvn+lPN08TbYW55PUCqxwZPGARTnMRFji/5BF9x2B8Hy >>>> LT2YdmPDOj9WaBzuNScO6vQhdHP0aHEeDj519ZIZyVV96avb64OTi3NP+ka+pPkq >>>> Ath81RE8CTAZ81SE4RSF+M24AbSxchvZzVaZ5d8jm9ieB9owyKY0crMuuGWzXmx8 >>>> 1agf40TfDYgqOJnwtNvtPzgIAfcZekneIt5n04/SO8xHTNZa7V/RO+bzg7mJ3pC/ >>>> FaMYVI01wMzSqoil1QycgH4lkcBIMgc97Xff0D/f2TWDMoaJxgyvelGySGfQQreu >>>> pR+3ssSNjI0Ylxzq3Nda0HZR6JxlGJ2yJeRl0KReAfIXTpsNjVqLOSMLKlnOHClY >>>> AuS0dJQDd2TLZ4i4rgyzcWUbYTsXP7HQf5daeNDfyqM2OJGgHLaFY1AAmxbIUeJ0 >>>> /p7s/iUpn5HsJepdYVDb >>>> =iMey >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:56:40 UTC