- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:44:24 -0400
- To: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Haven't we discussed all of this ad nauseam months and months and months ago? Why in the world are we going through this again? Lee On 10/24/2012 9:42 AM, William Waites wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 24/10/12 11:53, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >>> There are two use cases: >>> 1/ Exchange of RDF in JSON > I suppose I'm not clear on the motivation or importance of this > use case. We already have plenty of ways to exchange RDF, why > do we need another? It seems to me that having two kinds of > JSON for doing RDF would just create unnecessary confusion. > > Cheers, > - -w > > - -- > William Waites MBCS > Network Engineer Research Fellow > High-speed Universal Broadband Scotland School of Informatics > University of Stirling University of Edinburgh > http://www.tegola.org.uk/ wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQh/AsAAoJEAmkx526g9IZs2oP/2ySgkwLQq+AuJHFES0bbecL > R6LbP7hwhAoH2y5H8iEit29hrlRSgmKOj5jFhYKR5rYrJohRXy0X3v51co6V/lGk > iquSJUpyye4ZQn3P3kXh6pkJm0zHWYEHOK3mDQ5D2GG7PCxSkNOGZMEeGFEXlnGD > yqArrNZiJ71pQux0bF5HckPaNepx+5aEOV4dr00bb5vh2X8G1i2l8kWl+HUEBqzt > l1aHpKZ29s9nHLf5FDxncvn+lPN08TbYW55PUCqxwZPGARTnMRFji/5BF9x2B8Hy > LT2YdmPDOj9WaBzuNScO6vQhdHP0aHEeDj519ZIZyVV96avb64OTi3NP+ka+pPkq > Ath81RE8CTAZ81SE4RSF+M24AbSxchvZzVaZ5d8jm9ieB9owyKY0crMuuGWzXmx8 > 1agf40TfDYgqOJnwtNvtPzgIAfcZekneIt5n04/SO8xHTNZa7V/RO+bzg7mJ3pC/ > FaMYVI01wMzSqoil1QycgH4lkcBIMgc97Xff0D/f2TWDMoaJxgyvelGySGfQQreu > pR+3ssSNjI0Ylxzq3Nda0HZR6JxlGJ2yJeRl0KReAfIXTpsNjVqLOSMLKlnOHClY > AuS0dJQDd2TLZ4i4rgyzcWUbYTsXP7HQf5daeNDfyqM2OJGgHLaFY1AAmxbIUeJ0 > /p7s/iUpn5HsJepdYVDb > =iMey > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:45:01 UTC