Re: RDF WG charter and JSON-LD resolutions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24/10/12 11:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:

>> There are two use cases:
> 
>> 1/ Exchange of RDF in JSON

I suppose I'm not clear on the motivation or importance of this
use case. We already have plenty of ways to exchange RDF, why
do we need another? It seems to me that having two kinds of
JSON for doing RDF would just create unnecessary confusion.

Cheers,
- -w

- -- 
William Waites MBCS
Network Engineer                          Research Fellow
High-speed Universal Broadband Scotland   School of Informatics
University of Stirling                    University of Edinburgh
http://www.tegola.org.uk/                 wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=iMey
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:42:29 UTC