Re: RDF WG charter and JSON-LD resolutions

On Oct 24, 2012, at 09:44, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:

> Haven't we discussed all of this ad nauseam months and months and months ago?

Yes :)

> Why in the world are we going through this again?

That is a very good question.

Regards,
Dave


> 
> Lee
> 
> On 10/24/2012 9:42 AM, William Waites wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 24/10/12 11:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> 
>>>> There are two use cases:
>>>> 1/ Exchange of RDF in JSON
>> I suppose I'm not clear on the motivation or importance of this
>> use case. We already have plenty of ways to exchange RDF, why
>> do we need another? It seems to me that having two kinds of
>> JSON for doing RDF would just create unnecessary confusion.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> - -w
>> 
>> - -- William Waites MBCS
>> Network Engineer                          Research Fellow
>> High-speed Universal Broadband Scotland   School of Informatics
>> University of Stirling                    University of Edinburgh
>> http://www.tegola.org.uk/                 wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk
>> 
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>> 
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQh/AsAAoJEAmkx526g9IZs2oP/2ySgkwLQq+AuJHFES0bbecL
>> R6LbP7hwhAoH2y5H8iEit29hrlRSgmKOj5jFhYKR5rYrJohRXy0X3v51co6V/lGk
>> iquSJUpyye4ZQn3P3kXh6pkJm0zHWYEHOK3mDQ5D2GG7PCxSkNOGZMEeGFEXlnGD
>> yqArrNZiJ71pQux0bF5HckPaNepx+5aEOV4dr00bb5vh2X8G1i2l8kWl+HUEBqzt
>> l1aHpKZ29s9nHLf5FDxncvn+lPN08TbYW55PUCqxwZPGARTnMRFji/5BF9x2B8Hy
>> LT2YdmPDOj9WaBzuNScO6vQhdHP0aHEeDj519ZIZyVV96avb64OTi3NP+ka+pPkq
>> Ath81RE8CTAZ81SE4RSF+M24AbSxchvZzVaZ5d8jm9ieB9owyKY0crMuuGWzXmx8
>> 1agf40TfDYgqOJnwtNvtPzgIAfcZekneIt5n04/SO8xHTNZa7V/RO+bzg7mJ3pC/
>> FaMYVI01wMzSqoil1QycgH4lkcBIMgc97Xff0D/f2TWDMoaJxgyvelGySGfQQreu
>> pR+3ssSNjI0Ylxzq3Nda0HZR6JxlGJ2yJeRl0KReAfIXTpsNjVqLOSMLKlnOHClY
>> AuS0dJQDd2TLZ4i4rgyzcWUbYTsXP7HQf5daeNDfyqM2OJGgHLaFY1AAmxbIUeJ0
>> /p7s/iUpn5HsJepdYVDb
>> =iMey
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:46:52 UTC