- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:59:49 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 07/03/12 03:40, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:38 +0100, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> See >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.03.07 > > I wonder if there's any more we can do to get Turtle to Last Call as > soon as possible. (like addressing Henry's comment about dots in > names). And anything else (like .genid) that's pretty much done. +1 : good point. Maybe next-steps could be: 1/ Editors happy with the state of the doc for WG review 2/ WG review (I offer to review) 3/ Publish! I'm happy to review either now, before editorial completion, or later when it's close to LC form, which ever helps the editors most. == Tests Test work can be in parallel to the doc; it would be good to have the tests ready around LC; I know they are already being used. They need review coverage. There needs to be additions for escape coverage and for plain literal/xsd:string at least. Some test aren't passable by a parser that checks IRIs. e.g. test-29. The test are going to be important for Turtle. W3C have a specific license for tests: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-license which includes: """No right to create modifications or derivatives of W3C documents is granted pursuant to this license.""" i.e. you can't change the tests and claim compliance! == A quick skim of the doc There are various issues marked in the document. Some look out-of-date and all must go for LC. Scanning the doc I see: ISSUE-4: Do we depecate N-Triples and use Turtle instead? (no!) ISSUE-12: This is closed ISSUE-67: \xxxx escaping in prefixed names Can we close this? It's now "just" editing. "Decide the name for N′ (N-Triples)" Naming: Namespace: http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Turtle Local name: turtle (so that makes http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Turtleturtle -- looks wrong to me!) > > The Graphs discussion only endangers the group if we let it outside of > its joyful little box. > > -- Sandro This comment (to SPARQL-WG but it relates) is about Turtle: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Feb/0103.html It would be helpful to SPARQL-WG to decide this, ideally with no change. Andy
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 11:00:31 UTC