- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:36:38 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
>>>>> "Sandro" == Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> writes:
Sandro> Maybe this should be a new ISSUE. I can see reasons one
Sandro> might want both, but it's easy to go from complete to
Sandro> incomplete with a subgraph relation, and I'm not sure how to
Sandro> go from incomplete to complete. I guess with pointing to
Sandro> the file you got it from, which seems much trickier.
Something about "complete" and the open world assumption troubles
me. Anyone can always add another quad... If we are to provide a way to
call a graph complete, I guess we should be explicit about what this
means.
Cheers,
-w
--
William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org>
http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org>
F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 07:37:12 UTC