- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:46:38 +0200
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Regrets for today. I'm at a project meeting. On 27 Sep 2011, at 18:47, Guus Schreiber wrote: > - ISSUE-12 language-tagged literals > > If the poll remains this way only proposals 1 and 2d stand a chance to get accepted by consensus (given the number of "no"s for the other proposals). Is this what we want? I'd like to see a check for consensus for 2d. Also a reminder that there's proposed spec text for implementing it: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Sep/0083.html Best, Richard
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 07:47:44 UTC