- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:21:13 +0100
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 08:21:47 UTC
On Sep 28, 2011 8:47 AM, "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > Regrets for today. I'm at a project meeting. Same excuse, different project. Regrets from my side as well. Tom > > On 27 Sep 2011, at 18:47, Guus Schreiber wrote: > > - ISSUE-12 language-tagged literals > > > > If the poll remains this way only proposals 1 and 2d stand a chance to get accepted by consensus (given the number of "no"s for the other proposals). Is this what we want? > > I'd like to see a check for consensus for 2d. > > Also a reminder that there's proposed spec text for implementing it: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Sep/0083.html > > Best, > Richard
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 08:21:47 UTC