- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:47:03 +0200
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
See: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.09.28 Two remarks from my perspective: - Liaison with Provenance WG: Sandro's trust use case appears to capture (most) required functionality (but the Prov WG will have to verify this). Suggestion is to focus for the moment on this use case. - ISSUE-12 language-tagged literals If the poll remains this way only proposals 1 and 2d stand a chance to get accepted by consensus (given the number of "no"s for the other proposals). Is this what we want? Guus
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2011 16:47:38 UTC