- From: Matteo Brunati <m.brunati@webprofession.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:16:21 +0200
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
regrets for today, on travel, sorry. matt On 9/27/11, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote: > See: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.09.28 > > Two remarks from my perspective: > > - Liaison with Provenance WG: > Sandro's trust use case appears to capture (most) required functionality > (but the Prov WG will have to verify this). Suggestion is to focus for > the moment on this use case. > > - ISSUE-12 language-tagged literals > > If the poll remains this way only proposals 1 and 2d stand a chance to > get accepted by consensus (given the number of "no"s for the other > proposals). Is this what we want? > > Guus > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:16:50 UTC