Re: WG Time on RDF Literals issue

Ian, Michael

my goal proposing the poll was to try to put and end to this... Please cast your vote in the poll. With a bit of luck some sort of a consensus will emerge and then we can move on.

All: I think it would be better if we all chose only one 'Yes, and prefer' option. That would help in finding a way out...


On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:17 , Ian Davis wrote:

> Hi all,
> I think we're spending a lot of time on the literal issue yet it is supposed to be a time permitting work item. It would be a shame if more important issues such as graphs were pushed out into a wg extension.
> To be honest I'm not even sure what the pressing need is to change literals in this way. I would vote for option 1 in the poll currently.
> Ian

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key:

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 08:36:13 UTC