Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?

On 16 Nov 2011, at 12:58, Steve Harris wrote:
> I believe that to make this be friendly to the way people use SPARQL now (e.g. being able to ask cardinality questions, and use it for financially important things like accounting) SPARQL stores would need to normalise to one URI form internally.

Can you give a small example where this matters?


Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 21:35:54 UTC