Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral

I suggest that we move this issue forward by reopening the design (well 
I guess it is), and consider use cases and requirements ....

I think the claim that things are different from 2004 is based on 
experience showing that some of the use cases and requirements 
considered then have proved to be less important, and also that a 
significant non-requirement was overrated (that being the relationship 
of XML Literals and OWL)


Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 16:28:33 UTC