- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:13:57 +0100
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
The problem is that both the OWL and RIF are in dormant state. What this means is that if XSD Datatypes become a standard, they will both wake up, change the references in their document, maybe handle some errors, publish an edited document, and then the groups will be closed... I am not sure that what you propose is editorial only in terms of the document. If it is not, I do no think it is that simple... David or Guus, it would be a good idea to contact officially the RIF and OWL WG chairs on this. Cc it to the Coordination Group... Thanks Ivan On Nov 10, 2011, at 18:06 , RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/80 > > Raised by: Richard Cyganiak > On product: RDF General > > The ISSUE-12 and ISSUE-71 resolutions, which are now implemented in the RDF Concepts ED [1], have removed the distinction between plain and typed literals from the RDF abstract syntax. > > This has a major effect on the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [2]. Parts of it are now obsolete, and the rest needs updating. > > RDF-WG should ask OWL-WG and RIF-WG to update the document. > > [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/ > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:11:36 UTC