- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:10:46 +0000
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Apologies, please ignore this, wrong list. Again! I wish we were already in a position to handle Last Call comments in this WG… ;-) Sorry, Richard On 7 Nov 2011, at 20:29, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > I did some work on addressing R2RML LC comments today and updated the wiki accordingly: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Last_Call > > I believe that all LC comments on R2RML are now in one of the following states: > > a) It is formally addressed. > > b) A formal response has been sent and is awaiting reply from the reporter. > > c) An issue has been raised and needs to be resolved by the WG before a formal response can be sent. > > The following eight issues need to be resolved in order to address all comments: > > * ISSUE-57 > * ISSUE-68 > * ISSUE-70 > * ISSUE-71 > * ISSUE-72 > * ISSUE-73 > * ISSUE-74 > * ISSUE-75 > > A summary of changes made to the R2RML spec after LC is on the wiki: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Last_Call_Changes_to_R2RML > > It should be helpful in assessing and documenting the impact of the LC phase on the spec. The changed parts would also benefit from another round of review. > > Best, > Richard
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 21:11:17 UTC