Re: Status update on LC comments and post-LC changes to R2RML

Apologies, please ignore this, wrong list. Again! I wish we were already in a position to handle Last Call comments in this WG ;-)

Sorry,
Richard


On 7 Nov 2011, at 20:29, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> I did some work on addressing R2RML LC comments today and updated the wiki accordingly:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Last_Call
> 
> I believe that all LC comments on R2RML are now in one of the following states:
> 
> a) It is formally addressed.
> 
> b) A formal response has been sent and is awaiting reply from the reporter.
> 
> c) An issue has been raised and needs to be resolved by the WG before a formal response can be sent.
> 
> The following eight issues need to be resolved in order to address all comments:
> 
> * ISSUE-57
> * ISSUE-68
> * ISSUE-70
> * ISSUE-71
> * ISSUE-72
> * ISSUE-73
> * ISSUE-74
> * ISSUE-75
> 
> A summary of changes made to the R2RML spec after LC is on the wiki:
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Last_Call_Changes_to_R2RML
> 
> It should be helpful in assessing and documenting the impact of the LC phase on the spec. The changed parts would also benefit from another round of review.
> 
> Best,
> Richard

Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 21:11:17 UTC