Re: RDF* implementations and PG/SA modes [was: Re: Apache Jena support for RDF*]

Hi Thomas,
Regarding rdfjs/N3.js, see the announcement here by Ruben [1], Github link [2] and the data model spec [3]

HTH

Best,

[1]  https://twitter.com/RubenVerborgh/status/1288217897421201409 <https://twitter.com/RubenVerborgh/status/1288217897421201409>
[2] https://github.com/rdfjs/N3.js/tree/v1.6.0#compatibility <https://github.com/rdfjs/N3.js/tree/v1.6.0#compatibility>
[3] https://github.com/rdfjs/data-model-spec/pull/165 <https://github.com/rdfjs/data-model-spec/pull/165>

> Le 8 août 2020 à 15:49, thomas lörtsch <tl@rat.io> a écrit :
> 
> 
>> On 8. Aug 2020, at 12:18, thomas lörtsch <tl@rat.io> wrote:
>> Do you or anybody here happen to keep track of which implementations out there support which mode - SA, PG, both?
> 
> If that sounded a little lazy, then maybe it was… So here’s my homework:
> 
>    SA  PG  Implementation  Documentation
> 
>        x   AnzoGraph       https://docs.cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph/v2.2/userdoc/lpgs.htm?Highlight=rdf
>    x       BlazeGraph      https://github.com/blazegraph/tinkerpop3
>    x       GraphDB         http://graphdb.ontotext.com/documentation/9.2/free/devhub/rdf-sparql-star.html
>    x       Jena            https://jena.apache.org/documentation/rdfstar/
>    x   x   N3              shaky evidence: I seem to remember a mail on this list saying they can support both
>    x       rdf4j           https://rdf4j.org/documentation/programming/rdfstar/
>        x   Stardog         https://www.stardog.com/docs/#_edge_properties
> 
> Nobody seems to support mode switching. Stardog uses a modified RDF* syntax that unambiguously asserts the triple it annotates. 
> 
> Absolutely no guarantee that the list is correct, much less complete. 
> Additions and corrections obviously very welcome!
> 
> 
> Thomas