- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:55:17 +0200
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
good morning;
> On 15. Aug 2024, at 10:00, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/24 03:44, Thomas Lörtsch wrote:
> [...]
>> If an RDF-star entailment regime was enforced, in which 'rdfstar:states' entails the triple it states, then the stated triple term would be added to the graph as a proper/standard RDF triple, and consequently no additional BGPs would be needed that UNION a { :s :p ?o . } BGP with a { ?id rdfstar:states <<( :s :p ?o )>> } BGP. As SPARQL is implementing RDF simple entailment, no such entailment of a triple from a stated term is available, and the above described UNION operation is needed instead.
> Entailments do not "add" anything to the graph. The graph is the graph, after all, and is immutable. Entailments instead show what follows from the triples in a graph. Even in a system, an entailment regime can be enforced without adding anything to the data stored by the system.
the actual process is not that well defined : https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1059/ordring2013-paper3.pdf
best regards, from berlin,
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Friday, 16 August 2024 13:55:35 UTC