- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:11:11 -0400
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
Should we speak up here if we want to give a presentation? peter On 10/24/23 10:41, Adrian Gschwend wrote: > Dear group, > > Ora, Pierre-Antoine, and I have been discussing the topic for our upcoming > weekly call. > > Upon reviewing the suggestion posted by Peter on the list about "expanding > work from quoted triples to graph terms", Pierre-Antoine has rightly pointed > out that we have various perspectives within the group. These can be broadly > classified as: > > 1. Those keen on keeping the abstract syntax closely aligned with RDF 1.1, > emphasizing named graphs and their semantics. > 2. Enthusiasts of the CG abstract syntax, particularly "quoted triples" or > potentially "triple terms". > 3. Advocates for extending the CG abstract syntax to embrace "graph terms". > > Considering the diverse viewpoints, we propose that members with a firm stance > on any of these options prepare a presentation (around 5 minutes) to > articulate their arguments. > > regards > > Adrian >
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2023 21:11:18 UTC