- From: Adrian Gschwend <adrian.gschwend@zazuko.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:41:11 +0200
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
Dear group, Ora, Pierre-Antoine, and I have been discussing the topic for our upcoming weekly call. Upon reviewing the suggestion posted by Peter on the list about "expanding work from quoted triples to graph terms", Pierre-Antoine has rightly pointed out that we have various perspectives within the group. These can be broadly classified as: 1. Those keen on keeping the abstract syntax closely aligned with RDF 1.1, emphasizing named graphs and their semantics. 2. Enthusiasts of the CG abstract syntax, particularly "quoted triples" or potentially "triple terms". 3. Advocates for extending the CG abstract syntax to embrace "graph terms". Considering the diverse viewpoints, we propose that members with a firm stance on any of these options prepare a presentation (around 5 minutes) to articulate their arguments. regards Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend CEO Zazuko GmbH, Biel, Switzerland Phone +41 32 510 60 31 Email adrian.gschwend@zazuko.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2023 14:41:20 UTC