Re: Agenda+: Text Direction

If there is going to be discussion on text direction then I think it needs to 
be more general than this.

peter


On 6/20/23 17:48, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> At the potential for derailing other discussion, there are some points for discussion from [1] that bear discussion:
> 
> • Separate directional language-tagged string with rdf:dirLangString datatype, or extend the notion of language-tagged string and continue to use rdf:langString. (previously discussed? resolved?)
> • Bikeshedding terminology for literal element:
>      •  text direction – From previous proposals
>      •  base direction – From Unicode bidi basics
>      •  initial text direction – From Wiki
>      •  text directionality – From HTML
> 
> This is not a discussion about syntax, but needs to consider implications for SPARQL and Semantics.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/48
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2023 12:00:52 UTC