Re: [External] : is RDFn in the scope of the working group

My view is that RDFn is not in scope as it does not build on the notion of a 
quoted triple.


But this is something that I believe requires a Chairs' ruling.


peter



On 1/26/23 12:53, Souripriya Das wrote:
> I believe so. See the red portion in the paragraph below taken from the 
> charter. Thanks. -- Souri.
>
>
>     Scope
>
> The scope of this Working Group is to extend the recommendations defining 
> RDF 1.1 and SPARQL 1.1 with the features introduced by RDF-star. More 
> precisely, RDF-star introduces the notion of /quoted triple/ to express 
> statements about statements. The abstract and concrete syntaxes of RDF and 
> SPARQL are extended to support this new feature, as well as their respective 
> semantics.
>
> The community group has identified, in its final report 
> <https://www.w3.org/2021/12/rdf-star.html>, which recommendations should be 
> updated, and a possible path for updating them. The Working Group may 
> however reconsider this and proceed differently from the Community Group's 
> proposal. For every recommendation updated by this Working Group, the 
> pending editorial errata will also be addressed. The Working Group will also 
> consider allowing new features 
> <https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#allow-new-features> in these 
> recommendations, according to Section 6.3.11.4 of the W3C process 
> <https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#revised-rec-features>, in order 
> to render future evolutions easier.
>
> The group SHOULD ensure that any RDF 1.1 data remains valid in this new 
> version. Furthermore, any RDF or RDFS entailment drawn under RDF 1.1 
> semantics SHOULD also remain valid in this new version.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 26, 2023 12:22 PM
> *To:* public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* [External] : is RDFn in the scope of the working group
>
> Is something like RDFn in scope for the working group?
>
>
> From the charter (at https://www.w3.org/2022/08/rdf-star-wg-charter/ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/2022/08/rdf-star-wg-charter/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LjeGeUj9jwsMXx5n5wMyLQB3SRLui4eB4a8bb8Ts-9M-2tuph8v5x5pk5mTVOYKCwfnkh4K9dIjzQdFizz3z7XSspw$>):
>
>
>
> The scope of this Working Group is to extend the recommendations defining 
> RDF 1.1 and SPARQL 1.1 with the features introduced by RDF-star. More 
> precisely, RDF-star introduces the notion of /quoted triple/ to express 
> statements about statements. The abstract and concrete syntaxes of RDF and 
> SPARQL are extended to support this new feature, as well as their respective 
> semantics.
>
>
> The following features are out of scope, and will not be addressed by this 
> Working group.
>
>   * Adding other improvements or extensions to RDF or SPARQL. Given the
>     number of recommendations that this Working Group needs to update, it is
>     important to keep its scope very focused.
>
>
> peter
>
>
>