- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:21:16 +0000
- To: Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
- Cc: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 23/01/2023 15:50, Thomas Lörtsch wrote:
> In summary it seems that there is no very strong leaning to one side or the other.
More importantly, has any implementation changed its fundamental design
to accommodate quoted triples.
I don't know of any.
> Named graphs are an interesting aspect: they have no semantics and are not part of the RDF core. They are designed as a database administrators tool.
That one usage pattern but not the only one.
(There are two data management patterns, at least).
There were multiple, already in-use, existing patterns/use cases
using multiple graphs in a store. The spec tries to be neutral.
Andy
Received on Monday, 23 January 2023 18:21:30 UTC