- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:35:18 -0500
- To: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Mark Birbeck wrote: > Whilst some kind of vocabulary extension is of course important, as > far as I know the only substantial criticism that has been levelled at > RDFa is its requirement to use CURIEs/prefix mappings, and so I think > we should really put some effort into addressing that. > > Fixing this would be low-hanging fruit, for us. Sounds good ... revised agenda: ========== Thursday, November 12th 2009 1500 UTC, W3C Zakim bridge tel:+1.617.761.6200 conference code RDFA irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa Duration: 60 minutes Scribe: Zakim, pick a victim ========== Agenda: 1) Action Items http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary 2) RDFa WG charter updates (short - 10 minutes) 3) URIs in @rel, @rev, @property, @typeof and @datatype -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Establishing an Open Digital Media Commerce Standard http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/09/28/a-digital-content-commerce-standard/
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 15:34:20 UTC