- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:21:13 -0600
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4AFC27E9.1080601@aptest.com>
FWIW, I think I agree with Mark on this one. It is low hanging fruit. Note that no matter what, changes like these are things that relate to a future version of RDFa, not to the current version. Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Manu, > > I'm afraid I still disagree with the priorities here, for the reasons > explained at [1] and [2]. > > Whilst some kind of vocabulary extension is of course important, as > far as I know the only substantial criticism that has been levelled at > RDFa is its requirement to use CURIEs/prefix mappings, and so I think > we should really put some effort into addressing that. > > Fixing this would be low-hanging fruit, for us. > > It simply requires us to agree on how we allow full URIs in @rel, > @rev, @property, @typeof and @datatype. > > (I had a full proposal at [3], which seemed to be supported on the > list. Toby had an issue with how my proposal related to existing eRDF > content, using the example of "dc:creator" -- but this might be > incorrect, because as far as I can see, eRDF uses dots not colons.) > > I realise that Hixie would prefer to have no prefix mappings at all in > RDFa, but I think that horse has bolted. > > But I do think that providing support for full URIs, so that authors > at least have the choice of whether to use prefixes or not, would go a > long way towards answering his criticism. > > And it's not as if the feature isn't useful, either; when using small > 'packets' of RDFa, such as on one or two elements, it's often more > convenient to provide the complete URI, and not bother at all with > prefix mappings. > > Regards, > > Mark > > [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Oct/0045.html> > [2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Oct/0050.html> > [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jul/0062.html> > > -- > Mark Birbeck, webBackplane > > mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com > > http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck > > webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number > 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, > London, EC2A 4RR) > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We have a telecon in 1.5 hours, let's try to get a game plan together on >> implementing an experimental @vocab extension for extending the list of >> reserved words. >> >> ========== >> Thursday, November 5th 2009 >> 1500 UTC, W3C Zakim bridge >> tel:+1.617.761.6200 conference code RDFA >> irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa >> Duration: 60 minutes >> Scribe: Zakim, pick a victim >> ========== >> >> Agenda: >> >> 1) Action Items >> http://www.w3.org/2009/11/05-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary >> >> 2) RDFa WG charter updates (short - 10 minutes) >> >> 3) @vocab discussion >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) >> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Establishing an Open Digital Media Commerce Standard >> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/09/28/a-digital-content-commerce-standard/ >> >> >> > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 15:22:03 UTC