Re: Consensus on alternate prefixing mechanism

Hi Manu,

> It's because of this point that I think that "DEFAULTNS" would be
> preferable to a blank prefix identifier for changing the default namespace.
>
> I believe that we end up with a non-deterministic case if we allow
> arbitrary spaces between mappings and the equal sign AND try and use a
> blank prefix identifier to change the default namespace.

The point that both Shane and I were trying to stress is that these
are *not* namespaces.

Even when using @xmlns they are not namespaces. :)

They are prefix mappings, that just happen to be resident in the
@xmlns attribute.

But if we use @prefix (or @token, as I hope), then they lose even that
superficial relationship to namespaces.

So we should drop that term completely from our discussions.

Regards,

Mark

-- 
Mark Birbeck, webBackplane

mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com

http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck

webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
London, EC2A 4RR)

Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 14:23:25 UTC