Shane (et al) I have attached 3 additional tests along the line of what Shane says. They are all variants of #11: - 1.xhtml: specified an explicit xml:XMLLiteral datatype (the result should be the same as #11) - 2.xhml: changing 1.xhtml and using a different namespace (example.org) instead of the rdf one for the XMLLiteral, result should be a plain literal - 3.xhtml: the same as 1.xhtml, but using an unusual prefix (instead of 'rdf'). Th result should be the same as 1.xhtml. And... the first test did catch a bug in my implementation!:-) Ie, the test _does_ make sense:-) Ivan Shane McCarron wrote: > I actually didn't realize test 11 exercised the funcitonality un til > Manu pointed it out (privately). However, yes - since there is explicit > text about dealing with XMLLiteral as a specified datatype, I think a > copy of test 11 that did that might be good. Might I suggest that > instead of using the prefix "rdf" we use something else? That way if an > implementation mistakenly is testing for the literal "rdf:XMLLiteral" it > would fail the test. > > Ivan Herman wrote: >> I am not sure what you want to test. We do have test #11 to see if the >> generated literal is indeed xml literal. >> >> Maybe the only additional variant of this test could be when the >> datatype is explicitly set to XMLLiteral (instead of relying on the >> @datatype="" and the recognition that the children do indeed include >> xml tags, which is test #11). Ie, Test #11 seems to be *more* than the >> basic XML Literal generation. >> >> Shane, is this what you were referring to, or was there more that you >> thought of? >> >> Ivan >> >> Shane McCarron wrote: >>> >>> Looking through the current tests I dont see any that exercise the >>> RDF datatype XMLLiteral - we probably need some? >>> >> > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC