RE: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews

Ben,

No doubt. Let's focus on the roll-out of XHTML1+RDFa, now!

However, it *should* be permitted to contemplate
on possible future directions.

Cheers,
	Michael 

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] 
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 5:45 PM
>To: Michael Bolger
>Cc: Hausenblas, Michael; Ivan Herman; RDFa; peter.krantz@gmail.com
>Subject: Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews
>
>
>Michael,
>
>Thanks for your feedback!
>
>I think it's very much worth thinking about next steps for 
>RDFa, but we 
>should also be careful not to get too far ahead of ourselves: our 
>primary focus over the next 3-4 months is to get RDFa-in-XHTML1.1 to 
>REC, get our implementations in sync, and build more examples/tools to 
>jumpstart folks working with RDFa.
>
>We need to be careful not to add new documents and thus further 
>opportunities for feature requests and delays, as that would only slow 
>down and probably hurt the effort.
>
>I certainly understand the desire to see this work in HTML5 (I want it 
>to work, too.) I just want to make sure we put our first stake in the 
>ground before we go there.
>
>-Ben
>
>Michael Bolger wrote:
>> 
>> Michael, Ivan,
>> 
>> Good, also:) I would like to see a cool graphic time-line
>> (1-3 years out?) for RDFa and all the related work;
>> vocabularies, modular ontology's, read-write stuff.
>> Fresh air as to how it might, will, all fit together.
>

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 06:41:54 UTC