Re: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions

In XHTML M12N we use #s_ for sections, and #a_ for appendices. 

My opinion is that we can easily extend this to use #A_ for attributes, 
#E_ for elements, and #P_ for productions.  It will scale well.

For anything else that might get referenced.... I think it would be a 
good idea to use the name from closest section heading - assigning a 
name if there is not one there already (e.g., section 6.2 does not have 
one right now, but should be "#s_object_resolution")

If this works for you all, I will implement it immediately.

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> Shane,
>
> Thanks for this quick *and* concise reply. I very much
> appreciate you doing the hard part of the work ... so let's
> see if my 2c are worth it ;)
>
> Two annotation forms come immediately into my mind:
>
> 1. An 'attribute-driven' one, where we assign ultra-cool URIs
> to according RDFa attributes. 
>
> Example:
> Section '9.2.1. The about attribute' would be known as
> 'http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#attribute_about'
>
> or 
>
> 2. A rather RDFish one, where we assign ultra-cool URIs based on
> the role an RDFa attribute plays in the generation of a triple.
>
> Example:
> Section '9.2.1. The about attribute'
> would be known as 'http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#explicit_subject'
>
>  
> Both proposed solutions have pro's and con's - please pick one
> (or propose an even more cooler scheme, etc. ;)
>
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>   
>  http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shane McCarron [mailto:shane@aptest.com] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 3:45 PM
>> To: Hausenblas, Michael
>> Cc: Ben Adida; RDFa mailing list; SWD Working Group
>> Subject: Re: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions
>>
>>
>>
>> Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>>     
>>> the ':specificationReference' property will actually
>>> point to, e.g., 'http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_9.2.5.'
>>>
>>> @Shane: Any preferences?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Yes - don't do that ;-)  For each point in the spec that you want to 
>> reference, please let me know and please suggest the name for a 
>> permanent ID.  Cool URIs don't change, and section numbers can change 
>> easily.  I am happy to annotate the document - just let me know.
>>
>> -- 
>> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
>> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
>> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>>
>>
>>
>>     

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 16:51:24 UTC