- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:49:27 +0200
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "RDFa mailing list" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD Working Group" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Shane, Great. Let's do it this way. #A_ for attributes, #E_ for elements, and #P_ for productions Please let me know when you're done so that I can update the RDFa TC Manifest document. Please note as well that I'll be off-line next week and I'll very likely resume the work from 5 Nov on ... Thanks again! Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: Shane McCarron [mailto:shane@aptest.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:50 PM >To: Hausenblas, Michael >Cc: Ben Adida; RDFa mailing list; SWD Working Group >Subject: Re: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions > >In XHTML M12N we use #s_ for sections, and #a_ for appendices. > >My opinion is that we can easily extend this to use #A_ for >attributes, >#E_ for elements, and #P_ for productions. It will scale well. > >For anything else that might get referenced.... I think it would be a >good idea to use the name from closest section heading - assigning a >name if there is not one there already (e.g., section 6.2 does >not have >one right now, but should be "#s_object_resolution") > >If this works for you all, I will implement it immediately. > >Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> Shane, >> >> Thanks for this quick *and* concise reply. I very much >> appreciate you doing the hard part of the work ... so let's >> see if my 2c are worth it ;) >> >> Two annotation forms come immediately into my mind: >> >> 1. An 'attribute-driven' one, where we assign ultra-cool URIs >> to according RDFa attributes. >> >> Example: >> Section '9.2.1. The about attribute' would be known as >> 'http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#attribute_about' >> >> or >> >> 2. A rather RDFish one, where we assign ultra-cool URIs based on >> the role an RDFa attribute plays in the generation of a triple. >> >> Example: >> Section '9.2.1. The about attribute' >> would be known as >'http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#explicit_subject' >> >> >> Both proposed solutions have pro's and con's - please pick one >> (or propose an even more cooler scheme, etc. ;) >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Michael Hausenblas, MSc. >> Institute of Information Systems & Information Management >> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH >> >> http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Shane McCarron [mailto:shane@aptest.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 3:45 PM >>> To: Hausenblas, Michael >>> Cc: Ben Adida; RDFa mailing list; SWD Working Group >>> Subject: Re: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions >>> >>> >>> >>> Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >>> >>>> the ':specificationReference' property will actually >>>> point to, e.g., 'http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_9.2.5.' >>>> >>>> @Shane: Any preferences? >>>> >>>> >>> Yes - don't do that ;-) For each point in the spec that >you want to >>> reference, please let me know and please suggest the name for a >>> permanent ID. Cool URIs don't change, and section numbers >can change >>> easily. I am happy to annotate the document - just let me know. >>> >>> -- >>> Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 >786-8160 x120 >>> Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 >>> ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com >>> >>> >>> >>> > >-- >Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 >Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 >ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 06:49:56 UTC