Re: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

+1 on all of these from me

- Matt

On 12/18/2012 5:29 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:
>
> Reading the recent comments and mails, it sounds to me that we probably may need at least to make some
>
> decisions (mostly book-keeping). I don't think that any of these issues prevent us from publishing
>
> as planned, but it would be good to have them clarified:
>
> I see the following:
>
> 1)Minor editorial fixes in drafts before publication http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0211.html
>
> 2)Test suite bugs
>
> 3)Removing uncommented test cases
>
> I hope we can sort these things out per email, so I'm giving it a try, please post your replies or comments to the following proposals to the list:
>
> PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html
>
> PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html
>
>  PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and move them to a separate folder for "unapproved" test cases)
>
> If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather on IRC today at the regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted out/further discussed there quickly (unfortunately, I won't be able to make it). Otherwise, just in case, if we have any concerns on  the proposals above which we can't sort out per email I suggest:
>
> PROPOSED:  Telco:  15 Jan 2013,  Time of Call: 15:00 UK <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=09&day=20&hour=10:00&min=00&sec=0&p1=43>, 10:00 (East US) ... if any of the proposals above raises objections
>
> FWIW, I vote "+1" to all of the above.
>
> Best  regards,
>
> Axel
>
> p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to proceed with the comment we got on the protocol validator, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0006.html ... hope this will sorty out per email, if
>
> someone more swapped in could take care, it'd be appreciated!
>