- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:36:20 -0500
- To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <50D07F64.3060202@thefigtrees.net>
I'm keen on all of these. On 12/18/2012 5:29 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote: > > Reading the recent comments and mails, it sounds to me that we > probably may need at least to make some > > decisions (mostly book-keeping). I don't think that any of these > issues prevent us from publishing > > as planned, but it would be good to have them clarified: > > I see the following: > > 1)Minor editorial fixes in drafts before publication > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0211.html > > 2)Test suite bugs > > 3)Removing uncommented test cases > > I hope we can sort these things out per email, so I'm giving it a try, > please post your replies or comments to the following proposals to the > list: > > PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html > > PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html > > PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and > move them to a separate folder for "unapproved" test cases) > > If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather on IRC today > at the regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted > out/further discussed there quickly (unfortunately, I won't be able to > make it). Otherwise, just in case, if we have any concerns on the > proposals above which we can't sort out per email I suggest: > > PROPOSED: Telco: 15 Jan 2013, Time of Call: 15:00 UK > <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=09&day=20&hour=10:00&min=00&sec=0&p1=43>, > 10:00 (East US) ... if any of the proposals above raises objections > > FWIW, I vote "+1" to all of the above. > > Best regards, > > Axel > > p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to proceed with > the comment we got on the protocol validator, cf. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0006.html > ... hope this will sorty out per email, if > > someone more swapped in could take care, it'd be appreciated! >
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:36:48 UTC