- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:32:48 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 2012-11-07, at 11:13, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> === d02 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108 >> >> Please confirm my re-phrasing of the red box about rdf:langstring. We >> can't call it "at risk" any more, going to PR. A pedantic reading of >> W3C practice might say we can't using rdf:langstring in a REC until >> RDF 1.1 Concepts is at least in PR, but I'm comfortable with the text >> I proposed here. > > Query looks good and it has fixed up the example fix from Steve pointed out. Do we have all the examples in the doc pulled out as tests? I think we did this for SPARQL 1.0, now the document is bigger it might be too time consuming though. > I think we are doing the community a favour by anticipating rdf:langString. Agreed. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 12:33:25 UTC