Re: URGENT SPARQL - please check diffs and changelogs on pubs! from Andy Seaborne on 2012-11-07 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2012)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:13:12 +0000
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <509A4248.4050000@epimorphics.com>

> === d02 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108
>
> Please confirm my re-phrasing of the red box about rdf:langstring. We
> can't call it "at risk" any more, going to PR.  A pedantic reading of
> W3C practice might say we can't using rdf:langstring in a REC until
> RDF 1.1 Concepts is at least in PR, but I'm comfortable with the text
> I proposed here.

Query looks good and it has fixed up the example fix from Steve pointed out.

I think we are doing the community a favour by anticipating rdf:langString.

	Andy

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:13:45 UTC