- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:37:39 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Thanks for your leadership with the comments, Andy. Regarding process: for comments that are about misunderstandings or things that we simply need to fix, it's fine for any WG member to reply officially. For anything that is requesting a change to a substantive part of a spec, we ought to continue with our same process that we've been doing to date. Lee On 10/22/2012 4:46 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > Regrets - I'm most likely going to miss the meeting. > > > On 22/10/12 21:29, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Look forward to talking to you tomorrow. Here's what we'll look to >> cover: >> >> 1. Admin >> 2. Comment processing > > We're getting some comments on the tests. I'm giving persomnal > responses where I think can to help the implementer but (1) it's kinda > lonely on the comments list currently (2) please check for anything > you think needs a WG response and (3) what is the correct process now? > >> 3. Entailment regime >> * Review what we know about which regimes we're likely to have >> implementations from >> * Consider marking other regimes informative or at-risk >> 4. Graph Store Protocol >> * Implementation status & validator status >> * What if GSP does not make it past CR? >> 5. Protocol >> * Implementation status & validator status >> 6. Published documents >> * Publication date: November 6 >> * "Changes Since Last Call" section >> >> talk to you then, >> Lee >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 13:38:22 UTC