- From: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:06:24 -0400
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Monday, October 22, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Review what we know about which regimes we're likely to have implementations from > Consider marking other regimes informative or at-risk FYI, I have recently finished adding support for RIF-XML and RIF in RDF parsing for FuXi. All that is missing are tests. My plan was to add 2 *basic* tests of: R rif:usedWithProfile P where - There is a RIF in RDF graph in the the dataset with graph IRI R - There is a RIF XML document that is dereferenceable from R This shouldn't require any changes to the way the manifest format that I'm aware of. Note, however, that (so far) this is the only projected implementation of this particular regime. > Graph Store Protocol > Implementation status & validator status > What if GSP does not make it past CR? Are there particular WG criteria that the GSP is at risk of not fulfilling that would cause this to happen? -- Chime Ogbuji Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com)
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 23:06:54 UTC